President Trump’s team is carefully considering the possibility of a rematch against President Biden, recognizing that debates between the two candidates could greatly impact Trump’s chances of winning. However, this desire for a face-off with Biden could potentially create conflicts with the Republican National Committee (R.N.C.), which has been exploring alternatives to the Commission on Presidential Debates (C.P.D.).
Although Trump has expressed a willingness to skip some G.O.P. primary debates, he remains eager to debate Biden. The R.N.C., on the other hand, is worried that if Trump decides not to participate in debates, it could give Biden an excuse to avoid engaging with him in a potential rematch. Despite this concern, it has been reported that Trump has chosen not to take part in the first debate, instead opting for a pre-recorded interview with Tucker Carlson.
Trump’s advisers firmly believe that debates against the sitting president are crucial for the success of his campaign. This viewpoint could clash with the R.N.C., which has been searching for alternative hosts for the debates. However, if the C.P.D. remains the only option for a debate with Biden, Trump is reportedly open to returning to this format.
While Trump’s desire for more debates against Biden aligns with his campaign’s strategy, it may challenge the R.N.C.’s efforts to shape the debate landscape. The R.N.C. requires candidates to sign a pledge to only participate in R.N.C.-sanctioned debates during the general election, potentially leading to conflicts with Trump’s debate plans.
The possibility of a Trump-Biden debate is already attracting attention early in the election cycle, indicating the anticipation of a potential rematch. Although it is still early in the campaign, the desire for face-offs between these two prominent figures could significantly impact the dynamics of the election season. Ultimately, the decision on debates rests with the candidates, but the interactions between the campaigns, the R.N.C., and the C.P.D. will play a decisive role in shaping the debate landscape.