Introduction: Anas Haqqani, a senior Taliban official, has expressed his support for Twitter and Elon Musk’s defense of “freedom of speech,” while criticizing Meta, the parent organization of Facebook’s Threads. The Taliban has chosen to use Twitter as its primary platform for communication and publicity, with its leaders actively engaging on the platform. This endorsement comes at a time when Twitter is considering potential legal action against Facebook for alleged intellectual property theft and copyright issues.
Read More: Anas Haqqani, a senior Taliban official, commended Twitter for its commitment to “freedom of speech” and emphasized the platform’s credibility and public nature. In contrast, he criticized Meta, suggesting that other platforms are unable to match Twitter’s alleged tolerance. The Taliban has actively utilized Twitter to communicate with an international audience, even with limited internet access in Afghanistan. Prominent Taliban spokespersons, such as Zabihullah Mujahid and Abdul Qahar Balkhi, regularly post updates and engage with followers on Twitter. The group also maintains Twitter profiles in multiple languages for its official news agency, Bakhtar.
Taliban’s Preference for Twitter: Even prior to Elon Musk’s involvement, the Taliban has demonstrated a preference for Twitter and remains highly active on the platform. Despite limited internet access in Afghanistan, the jihadist group has effectively utilized Twitter as a means of communication. The Taliban’s leaders, including Zabihullah Mujahid and Abdul Qahar Balkhi, frequently release official statements and interact with foreign officials through the platform. To ensure a wider reach, the group maintains Twitter profiles for its official news agency, Bakhtar, in various languages.
Read Also: Taliban’s Stance on Freedom of Speech: Although the Taliban initially expressed an interest in promoting freedom of speech upon taking control of Afghanistan in 2021, concerns have been raised regarding the group’s history of brutality, suppression of dissent, and restrictions on women’s rights. Under Taliban rule, journalists have faced violence and censorship, and women have been subject to oppressive bans on leaving their homes.
Parallel Between Musk and the Taliban: While there is no public endorsement from Elon Musk in support of the Taliban, both Musk and the Taliban have demonstrated an affinity for communist China. Tesla, under Musk’s leadership, maintains a showroom in the region where China’s Uyghur genocide is occurring. Furthermore, Musk has openly expressed admiration for China’s advancements in artificial intelligence. Similarly, the Taliban has welcomed Chinese investment and participation in the Belt and Road Initiative, despite China’s human rights abuses against Muslim populations.
Conclusion: The Taliban’s endorsement of Twitter and support for Elon Musk’s defense of freedom of speech shed light on the complex dynamics between social media platforms, corporate interests, and geopolitical actors. Twitter continues to be the preferred platform for the Taliban’s communication, despite concerns surrounding the group’s treatment of journalists and restrictions on freedom of speech and women’s rights in Afghanistan. The parallel between Musk’s admiration for China and the Taliban’s cooperation with China raises ethical questions regarding the relationship between corporations, human rights, and geopolitical interests.
Read Next: “The Nexus Between Corporate Ethics, Human Rights, and Geopolitical Interests”