In a recent development in the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump, a federal judge has expressed concerns about the handling of the case by Special Counsel Jack Smith. Judge Aileen Cannon, who presides over the case in the Southern District of Florida, denied the Department of Justice’s request for sealed filings and demanded more information regarding the use of an out-of-state grand jury in the investigation.

Judge Cannon’s brief highlighted the lack of sufficient legal or factual basis for the special counsel’s request to seal the filings. She also questioned the decision to involve an out-of-state grand jury in continuing the investigation and seeking post-indictment hearings related to the case.

The judge’s concerns emerged in response to the special counsel’s request for a hearing to examine potential conflicts of interest involving defense attorney Stanley Woodward, who represents a co-defendant in the case and three other individuals who may testify. This development further complicates the already complex legal battle.

The charges against Trump in this case include willful retention of national defense information, conspiracy to obstruct justice, and making false statements, totaling 37 counts. Trump has pleaded not guilty, and the trial is set to take place on May 20, 2024. Co-defendant Nauta, a Trump aide, and Carlos De Oliveira, the property manager at Mar-a-Lago, have also pleaded not guilty to their charges. De Oliveira has been accused by the special counsel of collaborating with Trump to conceal security footage.

DOJ Special Counsel Jack Smith has emphasized the importance of upholding the rule of law and conducting the investigation with the highest ethical standards. However, the judge’s concerns raise valid questions about the handling of the case and its potential future developments.