Renowned Harvard Law School professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz has publicly voiced his criticism of the recent indictment of former President Donald Trump and 18 others by District Attorney Fani Willis in Georgia. Dershowitz argues that the alleged “conspiracy” for which Trump is being indicted bears a striking resemblance to the actions taken by Democrats during the 2000 election involving Al Gore and George W. Bush.
Dershowitz points out that the legal tactics employed by Trump’s legal team, which include claims of fraud and challenging the election results, mirror those previously utilized by Democrats when they contested the outcome of the 2000 election. During the Bush v. Gore case that ultimately determined the 2000 presidential election, the Democrats utilized strategies similar to the ones for which Trump is now facing legal consequences.
Expressing his concerns about the indictment, Dershowitz highlights the fact that the actions in question were comparable to those previously engaged in by Democrats, which were not treated as criminal activities at the time. He cites various historical instances of election challenges, such as the Tilden-Hayes dispute, the 2000 and 2016 elections, as well as recent actions by Democrats including Jamie Raskin. Dershowitz argues that these actions should be considered within the realm of political discourse protected by the Constitution, rather than treated as criminal offenses.
Dershowitz further raises concerns about the strength of the indictment, labeling it as the “weakest” he has ever encountered against any candidate. Additionally, he warns against the potential for prosecution to become politically motivated and suggests that these indictments may set a precedent, allowing Republicans to similarly target Democrats, which goes against the warnings of Alexander Hamilton. The indictment alleges that even actions as mundane as tweeting and reserving a meeting room are part of an alleged criminal conspiracy.
Overall, Dershowitz’s criticism sheds light on concerns about potential double standards in politics and cautions against the dangerous politicization of legal prosecution.